Council Votes Against Affordable Housing Proposal, Sets Stage for Tribunal Appeal

In a surprising turn of events, the council voted twice against the Cold Creek neighbourhood proposal by Port Picton Homes, leaving developer David Cleave with no choice but to appeal to the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT). The denial contradicts recommendations from county planners, who supported the project, which includes plans for 904 energy-efficient homes priced between $375,000 and $450,000.

Cleave expressed disbelief at the council’s decision, emphasizing that it would not only delay the project by at least a year but also incur significant costs, potentially reaching $250,000, as the county will need to hire new planners and redo extensive studies for the appeal. Despite Cleave’s efforts to amend the proposal to address environmental concerns, including enhanced wetland protection and trail connectivity, council members opposing the development did not provide substantive reasons for their votes.

Critics within the council highlighted the land’s agricultural significance and the potential impact on the Cold Creek Watershed as their main concerns. However, the property has been zoned for town development since the 1970s. Mayor Ferguson and other supporters lamented the lost opportunity for affordable housing in the community, especially as many residents struggle to find suitable living conditions.

As the project moves to the OLT, the council’s decision raises questions about its approach to affordable housing and fiscal responsibility, especially given their previous votes on other financial matters. The community awaits the outcome, hopeful for a resolution that prioritizes housing accessibility.